Sample Proposal to Business Communications Company, Inc.
for a Report on Medical Imaging
Masha Zager
January 23, 2002
Report Abstract
The proposed report will update Business Communications Company, Inc.’s Report B-140, Medical Imaging: An Evolving Technology. It will review global markets for medical imaging products and will forecast trends and sales in these markets through 2007. Important manufacturers, technologies, and factors influencing demand will be discussed.
"Medical imaging products" are hardware, software, and supplies used to create, view, and manage visual images of non-visible organs of the human body for purposes of research, diagnosis, and guidance of non-invasive surgery. The report will focus on end-user markets including hospitals, research facilities, freestanding clinics, doctors’ offices, and equipment leasing companies.
The following well-established technologies will be included in the study: X-ray, including analog and digital X-ray; fluoroscopy, including standard and video fluoroscopy; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including standard MRI and functional MRI or MR fluoroscopy; computed tomography (CT), including standard CT, multislice or ultrafast CT, and electron beam tomography; single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT); positron emission tomography (PET); ultrasound, including 2-D and 3-D ultrasound; endoscopy, including fiberoptic endoscopy, video endoscopy, and ingestible cameras; and magnetic source imaging (MSI). In the last few years, several multimodal products have been developed in an attempt to combine the advantages of structural and functional imaging. Multimodal combinations currently on the market include CT/SPECT; CT/PET (Time Magazine’s "Medical Invention of the Year 2000"); MRI/MSI; and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), combining fiberoptic endoscopy and ultrasound.
Emerging technologies that may be included in the study if it appears that they will be commercially significant by 2007 are: magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS); electrical impedance tomography (EIT); electrical source imaging (ESI); computerized thermal imaging; and laser optical imaging, including nonlinear optical multiphoton interferometric scanning microscopy, optical coherence-based imaging, optical spectro-scopic imaging, laser opto-acoustic tomography, and laser Doppler blood flow imaging.
Technologies excluded from the study are EEG and ECG, except when combined with one of the included technologies, and (non-computerized) thermal imaging.
Products used for radiotherapy, nonmedical imaging (e.g. in physics, chemistry, geology, and industry), and veterinary medicine will be excluded from the study to the extent possible.
Medical imaging products are usually sold bundled as systems for creating or managing images. Systems include some or all of the following: radiation source; radiation detector; patient table and gantry; computers and displays; robotic software; image acquisition software; image management software; virtual reality software; and computer-aided diagnostic software. Supplies and accessories will be discussed only if there is a significant aftermarket for them.
Report Outline
Table of Contents
Introduction
Summary
Overview: history and current state of medical imaging
Types of technologies: Transmission, reflection, and emission imaging
Types of applications: Research, diagnosis, and surgery
Types of analysis: Structural and functional
Growth in use of computers, digitized imaging, and data communications
Improvements in quality, effectiveness, and safety
Government regulation
Food and Drug Administration
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (formerly HCFA)
State, local, and foreign government agencies
Industry structure
Major companies and market share
Major markets
Trends in price and price/performance
Other factors influencing demand:
Clinical guidelines issued by professional groups and insurers
Demographic changes
Market saturation
Training time
Technology, including patent evaluation
General technology issues
Image resolution
Image noise and artifacts
Image uniformity
Field of view – size, variability
Speed of image acquisition and generation
Risk/invasiveness
Radiation dose
Reaction to contrast media
Injury or infection
Patient comfort (including noise)
Overall exam time
Ease and reliability of operation
Detector stability
Open data communication standards (DICOM)
Technology issues by technology type
X-ray
Fluoroscopy
MRI
CT
SPECT
PET
Ultrasound
Endoscopy
MSI
Other
Markets by product/technology types
Imaging Systems:
X-ray (analog)
X-ray (digital)
Fluoroscopy
Video fluoroscopy
CT (single slice)
CT (multislice)
CT (electron beam tomography)
MRI
Functional MRI
SPECT
PET
Ultrasound
Fiberoptic endoscopy
Video endoscopy
Ingestible cameras
MSI
CT/SPECT and CT/PET
MRI/MSI
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
Image management systems:
Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS)
Virtual reality
Computer-aided diagnosis
Supplies and accessories with aftermarkets:
Film
Radioisotopes
Coils
Endoscopy accessory products
Contrast media?
Markets by application
Large-structure diagnosis
Neurology, brain research
Cardiovascular
Obstetrics
Mammography
Dentistry
Gastroenterology
Urology
Guidance for surgery
Other
Company profiles
Appendices
Conceptual Tables (Dummy Tables)
NOTE TO PROSPECTIVE AUTHORS: In your Step 4 proposal, you should submit a sufficient number of carefully composed "dummy" tables, so that we can evaluate the reasonableness of your proposed categories (e.g., your table row items) and your overall measurement scheme. (A typical finished BCC report has 30-50 tables.) In short, for Step 4, we need to know EXACTLY (or, as close you can come at this early stage) what you will be measuring during your approx. 3-month investigation. As you compose your dummy tables, please keep in mind that every BCC report is designed to tell how much of what is manufactured or consumed using which technologies, for what markets and in which applications, all by type and all with five-year forecasts. Also to be identified is, who is doing how much of what, how and why. Please see the BCC Author Guide for other report requirements.
1. SUMMARY TABLE
medical imaging user expenditures, through 2007
($ Millions)
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
Medical imaging systems |
|||||
|
Medical image management systems |
|||||
|
Supplies and accessories |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
2. CMS (formerly HCFA) ACTIONS REGARDING MEDICAL IMAGING SINCE 1997
|
|
|
NEW PROCE-DURE ADDED |
PROCEDURE DISALLOWED |
DESCRIPTION |
|
11/23/01 |
CMS-3077-N |
v |
PET scans disallowed unless scanners meet more stringent safety standards |
|
3. manufacturers of X-ray systems
market share (Dollar sales), 2001
[similar tables for other types of systems]
|
Manufacturer |
U.S. market share |
Global market share |
|
General Electric |
||
|
Toshiba |
||
|
Siemens |
||
|
Etc. |
4. number of medical imaging units in place, by location, 2001
|
Number of units |
|
|
|
|
United States |
|||
|
Europe |
|||
|
Japan |
|||
|
Canada, Australia, NZ |
|||
|
Other |
|||
|
Total |
5. number of radiology professionals, by location, 2001
|
Number of Radiologists |
|
|
|
Technicians/population |
|
|
United States |
|||||
|
Europe |
|||||
|
Japan |
|||||
|
Canada, Australia, NZ |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
6. price per study, by procedure type
[a study represents one patient session, during which several images may be produced. I plan to include several representative procedures, not necessarily those listed below. Data will probably be taken from HCFA reimbursements, unless alternative sources are identified.]
($)
|
1991 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
Chest X-ray |
|||||
|
Mammography |
|||||
|
Cardiac MRI |
|||||
|
Obstetric ultrasound |
|||||
|
Bronchoscopy |
|||||
|
Etc. |
7. MEDICAL IMAGING USER EXPENDITURES, BY LOCATION
($ Millions)
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
United States |
|||||
|
Europe |
|||||
|
Japan |
|||||
|
Canada, Australia, NZ |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
8. MEDICAL IMAGING USER EXPENDITURES, BY MARKET TYPE
(UNITED STATES)
($ Millions)
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
Hospitals |
|||||
|
Research laboratories |
|||||
|
Diagnostic clinics |
|||||
|
Doctors’ and dentists’ offices |
|||||
|
Equipment leasing companies |
9. HOSPITAL EXPENDITURES ON MEDICAL IMAGING, BY TECHNOLOGY TYPE (UNITED STATES)
($ Millions)
[similar tables for other market segments]
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
X-ray systems |
|||||
|
CT systems |
|||||
|
MRI systems |
|||||
|
Ultrasound systems |
|||||
|
Endoscopy systems |
|||||
|
PACS |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
10. HOSPITAL EXPENDITURES ON MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEMS,
BY APPLICATION (UNITED STATES)
($ Millions)
[similar tables for other market segments]
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
Neurology |
|||||
|
Cardiology |
|||||
|
Obstetrics |
|||||
|
Oncology |
|||||
|
Gastroenterology |
|||||
|
Dentistry |
|||||
|
Surgery |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
11. HOSPITAL EXPENDITURES ON CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING SYSTEMS,
BY TECHNOLOGY (UNITED STATES)
($ Millions)
[similar tables for other market segments/applications]
|
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
|
AAGR% 2002 – 2007 |
|
|
X-ray systems |
|||||
|
CT scanners |
|||||
|
MRI systems |
|||||
|
SPECT systems |
|||||
|
PET systems |
|||||
|
Ultrasound systems |
|||||
|
Other |
|||||
|
Total |
12. recent Patents and Patent Applications for medical imaging
|
Year |
Institution/ |
Title |
Number |
Description |